4 Approaches To Systems Integration
Methods for maximising the performance of your existing software infrastructure
As businesses evolve and new technologies come to market, inefficient software platforms can begin impacting performance and efficiency across departments and functions. When looking to upgrade or integrate such systems, there are vast array of options to consider which will vary depending upon the type of product (i.e. off-the-shelf, bespoke, cloud hosted, etc.) and the level of integration services provided. This paper will look at some of these options and has been written based on a combination of research undertaken and direct experience in various software projects, across multiple industrial sectors, with budgets ranging in size from £50,000 to £1,000,000.
Businesses who engage in IT software projects do so in the face of some pretty terrifying statistics relating to project failures, budget overruns and software misbehaving after release. Research undertaken by the McKinsey and the BT Centre for Major Programme Management at the University of Oxford  of large scale projects, being projects with an initial budget exceeding £10 million, discovered that 17 percent of projects failed so badly that they “threatened the very existence of the company”. Such projects are labelled within the industry as “Black Swan” projects, being defined as projects with budget overruns of at least 200 percent, based on a term originally coined by Nassim Nicholas Taleb  to define low probability events, with a large impact, which, with hindsight, are accepted as being rational and foreseeable.
Levi Strauss migrated to a $5 million SAP solution, during the switch over the business was unable to meet orders and was forced to close 3 distribution centres for a week, resulting in the business putting a charge against earnings of $192.5 million as a direct result of the failed implementation 
BSkyB’s appointment of EDS to implement a CRM system with a cost of £48 million sued for damages of £709 million; well in excess of EDS’ £30 million limitation of liability, which was removed due to BSkyB’s claim of misrepresentation by EDS being upheld 
“Our sales teams are exporting pricing data from our mainframesystems and generating their own bespoke proposals. Seniormanagement has no visibility of the value or structure of pendingopportunities, and operations are complaining that proposals aredeviating from the products and services we offer.”
- Rich & customised user interfaces
- Additional functionality
- Functionality builds upon existing databases
- May produce multiple users interfaces
Extending a product can introduce automated workflows over existingsystems that can ensure consistency across users with the ability tocapture information and provide detailed reporting. There are multipleways of extending both off-the-shelf and bespoke products. Productsextensions may be bespoke tools, depending upon the integrationoptions available (i.e. programming interfaces, data import/export,etc.), or developed using inbuilt programming languages, where thelegacy system is a product offering such support, such as SAP orSalesforce, which offer ABAP and Apex respectively.
“At the moment customers email us spreadsheets of orders, if the customer is new we then create them in our CRM package to get a customer reference, then add the order to our production system, then add the order to our finance system. I have a separate user account for each system.”
- Single point of entry, no duplicate entry
- Web & mobile user interfaces
- Aggregated workflows
- Authentication services required to support single sign-on
Wrapper interfaces can be developed to make internal operations more efficient but also to provide user interfaces for customers and supplier to increase productivity (by automating processes) and reducing risk (by auditing workflow activity). It may also be possible to support real-time cross-platform transactions across the underlying existing systems (where suitable programming interfaces exist). From a security perspective, relationships between user roles across systems will need to be considered. Also, where internal systems are being opened up to customers or suppliers planning around hosting and security will be required.
“Our engineers use a stand-alone application on their laptops, our finance system is hosted on an internal server and our HR system is in the cloud.”
- No changes to processes & user interfaces
- Automated data mapping & transformation
- Aggregated reporting & decision making
- No enhancement to product functionality
Aggregating data across multiple systems can provide businesses with the ability to make informed decisions based on consolidated, real-time information captured from multiple disparate systems. Data can also be stored and modelled over time to measure impact of decisions.
"We need to upgrade our current VB6/Access system. It doesn’t meet the current business needs and performance is terrible. However, the system has 10 years of undocumented tweaks and changes made by multiple developers that may or may not still be relevant to the business.”
- Iterative & incremental upgrade path
- Use new technology to refine workflows & processes
- Staged data migration
- Difficult with tightly coupled legacy system
With some systems the only option is to refactor or rebuild the existing application; reducing the system into modular components helps reduce the complexity of the task. Systems with complex business logic will require a significant amount of input from the business to remodel, refine and validate the processes and workflows required. A major benefit of a modular approach is to ensure that dependencies on the business can be allocated per module. Finally, remember that a bad VB6 system upgraded directly to VB.NET without reviewing the functionality will still be a bad system.
Below is a summary of features and attributes we have found to be common within successful integration projects, based on our experience, which we hope will help readers enjoy success and real commercial returns, whilst avoiding those Black Swans:
Integrate using services and programming interfaces where possible, integrating at a database level potentially bypasses a significant amount of business logic and data validation. Updating databases directly can cause major impact to applications running on this database. There can also be issues when reading the data, where the data may be transformed within an application, for example, where an ID for a department is still being stored as an enumeration in the application itself; this mapping information must then also be maintained by the integration layer. Finally, a service interface is a contract, when releasing a new version of a system all endeavours will be made to support existing interfaces, this is not the case with the database structure; which may result in failure, or more concerning, the undetected incorrect performance of the integration software.
Where there are one or more off-the-shelf products available research, and where possible prototype against, integration interfaces. There is often a considerable difference between pre-sales integration options and post-sales integration options, and poor interfaces will quickly turn an efficiently integrated platform into an isolated suite of stand-alone products. Understand the API restrictions: for example; is there a limit on the number of calls per day, and also any licencing implications of accessing the software via an integration layer?
Analysis is required to decide whether integrating with one or more systems will involve the replication of data or the implementation of cross-system business processes. Real-time distributed transactional systems with message queues are considerably more powerful than replicating data between systems, however, they are also more complicated and require a much greater analysis and understanding of the process flows within and between each of the integrating systems.
Avoid having data residing in multiple systems, and where the data does need to be shared across systems, where possible only enable updates to be committed in one system with those changes being published out. Having multiple systems responsible for maintaining the same entities will lead to a number of race conditions and difficulties from an auditing perspective.
Where possible, release early and often, and only move back release dates as a last resort. Research has shown large projects, projects with a budget of £650 thousand or more, have a failure rate 50 percent higher than small projects, projects with a budget of £230 thousand or less . Although, as it is not always possible to deliver projects in stages, consider implementing proof of concepts, prototypes, minimum viable products and beta releases to introduce functionality to end users as soon as possible.
- McKinsey – Delivering large-scales IT projects on time, on budget, and on value
- Nassim Nicholas Taleb – The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable
- Harvard Business Review - Why Your IT Project May Be Riskier Than You Think
- Linklaters – BSkyB vs EDS: Time to Reasses the Risks?
- Gartner – Why Projects Fail